I posted previously about the red, single, repeat flowering seedling. This germinated at the same time as that seedling, only from a different cross. Pink Petticoat is a very health, prolific miniature bred by Gene Strawn and introduced by Pixie Treasures back in 1979. I polled several folks several years ago, whose opinions I highly respect, about what minis were the healthiest for them, and which yielded good, solid seedlings. Pink Petticoat was a universal favorite.
I pollinated Pink Petticoat in earnest with everything I found interesting. This seedling was a very early surprise! It definitely has first generation hybrid vigor! None of the other seedlings expressed anything approaching its vigor. This is the plant one year from germination. It's planted in (and rapidly outgrowing!) a seven gallon nursery can.
The foliage is beautiful and completely healthy in this climate. All the plant parts are quite large.
I search it daily for evidence of any buds, and was thrilled to find ONE a few weeks ago. It's taken its time opening..from this...
to this in three weeks.
After two rather hot days (mid nineties) and watering the can daily, this greeted me this morning.
There wasn't any scent to perceive in the cooler morning air, but two hours later, it had a nose full! Quite sweet with tones of lemon zest and it lasted through several "sniffings". The color seemed to enjoy the increased heat and light, too.
There are a few anthers which appear to contain some pollen. The stigma also appears as if it might accept some pollen.
I like how decorative these first sepals are and how they give this bloom the "high-shouldered look".
1-72-1Hugonis is nearly prickle-free, except for the odd cane expressing enormous, red prickles. Pink Petticoat has prickles, but not an over abundance of them. This seedling expresses heavier prickles toward the lower portions of the canes. The top growing ends are nicely low in them.
After being unable to find the Double Hugonis and it had seemed impossible to bring Dr. E. M. Mills back into the country, I figured I would have to create my own double version of Hugonis. Of course I will be keeping an eye on this one!
Congratulations. This looks like a lovely little rose, May I be forward enough to ask you what is so special about R. Hugonis?
ReplyDeleteThank you. Well, let's see...it's a virtually untapped potential source for yellow; it's rudely healthy; it's very cold and heat hardy; it's absolutely gorgeous in its own right; it has great scent which it seems very willing to impart to its offspring...what's not to like? When you consider other species, such as Rugosa, Wichurana, Multiflora, even my beloved Fedtschenkoana, they've all been mined to death and appear quite frequently in the ancient geneologies of many modern roses. Hugonis has fewer than two dozen descendents and nothing which could honestly be considered a "modern rose". If I want to create something new, different, unusual and, hopefully, improved over what's gone before, shouldn't I be looking at something unused instead of "stirring the pot", using the same-old, same-old and hoping for different results?
ReplyDeleteThank you for the detailed response. It makes absolute sense now. I'm looking forward to your new creations.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome! Believe me, so am I!
ReplyDelete